Cases

Victory is sweet! A hard-fought battle in Ohio for Marino\WARE. The Ohio Appellate Court issued a thoughtful opinion affirming our argument that the Business Judgment Rule protects Marino\WARE's former CEO.

This article details Johnson & Johnson's efforts to bar pro hac vice admissions to two plaintiffs' attorneys at Beasley Allen, as well as other moves by the company to disempower the prosecution. In response to these moves by J&J, Jeffrey Pollock wrote that Birchfield and O'Dell were both in good standing in the jurisdictions where they practice, and that Johnson & Johnson's application to bar their pro hac vice admissions is, in essence, another attempt to disqualify them. R

This article describes Johnson & Johnson's vehement attempts to disqualify two Beasley Allen attorneys from representing a couple in their talcum powder suit. Atlantic County Superior Court Judge John C. Porto granted the motion for these attorneys' pro hac vice admission, despite J&J's persistent argument on denial of their application. Although counsel for the couple demanded the "sideshows or distractions" stop, J&J has stated that they plan to appeal this decision. Refere

In S & A Realty Corp. v. Kearny Industrial Associates, LLP, 2007 WL 2323492, Jeffrey Pollock successfully represented S&A Realty Corp. in...

In Joel Miller, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Alisa Adler, et al., Defendants (Civil Action No. 17-7149 (JBS/KMW)), Jeffrey Pollock represented...

This article details the intense landscape of mass torts, particularly focusing on Johnson & Johnson's talc litigation and the strategic legal battles within. Jeffrey Pollock is highlighted for effectively challenging J&J's attempts to disqualify his client firm, Beasley Allen, from the New Jersey talc multicounty litigation. This piece underscores the critical role of firms like Pollock Law in navigating complex legal challenges against major corporations. References Law.com